Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 10 von 1408
Philosophical studies, 2020-08, Vol.177 (8), p.2395-2415
2020

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Conjoined twinning & biological individuation
Ist Teil von
  • Philosophical studies, 2020-08, Vol.177 (8), p.2395-2415
Ort / Verlag
Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands
Erscheinungsjahr
2020
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
SpringerLink
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • In dicephalus conjoined twinning, it appears that two heads share a body; in cephalopagus, it appears that two bodies share a head. How many human animals are present in these cases? One answer is that there are two in both cases—conjoined twins are precisely that, conjoined twins . Another is that the number of humans corresponds to the number of bodies—so there is one in dicephalus and two in cephalopagus. I show that both of these answers are incorrect. Prominent accounts of biological individuation, which treat the organism as an integrated whole, reveal that in these and other cases of conjoined twinning the ‘twins’ share a single human animal. This has a number of consequences for the debate about what we are. First, if animalism is true, individuals of our kind can be—and are—profoundly psychologically divided. Second, cephalopagus twinning does not divide animalism from its rivals, as has been claimed. Finally, animalists can reply to a vicious species of the ‘too many thinkers’ problem to which they are allegedly uniquely vulnerable.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 0031-8116
eISSN: 1573-0883
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-019-01316-x
Titel-ID: cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s11098_019_01316_x

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX