Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Ramos, Eliana Marisa
• Wojta, Kevin
• Yang, Zhongan
• Brushaber, Danielle
• Foroud, Tatiana M.
• Forsberg, Leah K.
• Heuer, Hilary W.
• Lago, Argentina Lario
• Rademakers, Rosa
• Coppola, Giovanni
• Boeve, Brad F.
• Rosen, Howard J.
• Boxer, Adam L.
• Geschwind, Daniel H.

Titel

Inferring genetic relatedness in a large, multisite frontotemporal dementia series: Data from the ALLFTD consortium

Ist Teil von

• Alzheimer's & dementia, 2023-06, Vol.19 (S1), p.n/a

Erscheinungsjahr

2023

Quelle

Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Background The ARTFL‐LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD) research consortium is actively enrolling participants across 23 North American centers to characterize sporadic and familial frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and prepare for disease‐modifying clinical trials. The ability to identify, otherwise unknown, relatives among these participants is critical to rigorously build family structures for downstream clinical and genetic research studies. Methods Genome‐wide SNP genotyping data from ALLFTD participants was used to perform lineage analyses using PLINK. Briefly, QC was performed to remove individuals with low call rate and filter autosomal SNPs for missingness, allele frequency, and deviation from Hardy‐Weinberg equilibrium, before pruning SNPs for linkage disequilibrium. Identity‐by‐descent (IBD) estimates were then calculated for determining relatedness, followed by family‐network identification and pedigree reconstruction using PRIMUS. Results About 46% of ALLFTD participants that were genotyped and passed QC (n = 1,453) had reported a family history, while 50% (n = 721) did not and were considered sporadic. We identified a total of 460 participants that had at least one relative who was second degree or closer (PI_HAT>0.1875) based on IBD sharing, resulting in 150 family networks. This included 9 participants who self‐identified as sporadic, demonstrating the utility of direct genetic characterization to determine familiality in FTD. Most of the predicted families were associated with disease causing variants in the 3 major FTD‐causing genes: 66 families with known C9orf72 repeat expansion carriers, 35 with MAPT (including 11 families with the variant historically known as p.P301L) and 30 with GRN pathogenic variant carriers, as well as 2 families with carriers of both a C9orf72 expansion and a GRN pathogenic variant. We also identified 5 families with carriers of pathogenic variants in other familial dementia genes (2 TARDBP, 2 VCP and 1 PSEN1), as well as 12 families with yet unknown genetic etiology. Conclusions This dataset sets up a crucial resource to increase statistical accuracy and power in downstream association studies using the clinical, neuropsychological, neuroimaging and biomarker data currently being generated by the ALLFTD consortium. It will also facilitate genetic studies aimed at novel gene discovery, and identification of haplotypes and genetic modifiers associated with the 3 major FTD causal genes.