Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Aslami, Pooja
• Aryal, Tara
• Rai, Astha
• Bhujel, Niranjan
• Rekabdarkolaee, Hossein Moradi
• Fu, Kaiqun
• Tonkoski, Reinaldo
• Wang, Zongjie
• Hansen, Timothy M.

Titel

Power System Frequency Dynamics Modeling, State Estimation, and Control using Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (NODEs) and Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) Machine Learning Approaches

Ist Teil von

• Applied computing review : a publication of the Special Interest Group on Applied Computing, 2024-05, Vol.24 (1), p.24-39

Ort / Verlag

New York, NY, USA: ACM

Erscheinungsjahr

2024

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

ACM Digital Library (Association for Computing Machinery)

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• With the global energy transition of the electric power system, grid control, supervision, and protection is becoming more challenging. With the increasing integration of renewable energy sources (RES), the system dynamics are changing, causing traditional power system dynamic modeling with swing equation-based modeling approaches to fail. Additionally, the converter-dominated power grid is decreasing the system inertia, making the power system more fragile to the frequency swings. This paper first investigates and compares the application of a model-based Kalman filter state estimation approach with (i) a model-free machine learning approach --- neural ordinary differential equations (NODEs) --- and (ii) a data-driven system identification (SysId) approach to model and infer critical state values of the power system frequency dynamics. Then a model predictive control (MPC) framework is compared to a model-free Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) reinforcement learning (RL) control algorithm in providing efficient fast frequency response (FFR) to the power system frequency dynamics. The approaches are compared in terms of their performance goals as well as their per-timestep computational efficiency. The comparative study for state estimation shows that for the model-free requirement, both NODEs and SysId can provide accurate state estimates; however, with increasing model complexity, NODEs can be a better choice for model identification. Similarly, the results from the FFR comparative study show that the SAC RL-based FFR, once trained, outperforms MPC with better control signals and faster computation time, making the SAC RL-based FFR better option for providing FFR to the power system.